Daniel Slijepcevich is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 6th June 1991. Daniel graduated from John Marshall Law School and is now based in Marin.

Lawyer Information

NameDaniel Slijepcevich
First Admitted6 June 1991 (28 years, 12 months ago)
Bar Number152392


Phone Number(415) 492-9877
Fax Number(415) 492-1377


Law SchoolJohn Marshall Law School (Chicago IL)
Undergraduate SchoolUniv of Illinois (Urbana Champaign IL)


Current AddressSlijepcevich & Associates
724 Birchwood Ct
San Rafael, CA 94903
Current CountyMarin
Current DistrictDistrict 1


3 November 2008Active (11 years, 6 months ago)
4 October 2008Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA (11 years, 7 months ago)
6 June 1991Admitted to The State Bar of California (28 years, 12 months ago)

Disciplinary and Related Actions

4 October 200806-O-14108
Discipline w/actual suspension (Not Eligible To Practice Law in CA)

Discipline Summaries

October 4, 2008

DANIEL SLIJEPCEVICH [#152392], 49, of San Rafael was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 30-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect Oct. 4, 2008.

Slijepcevich stipulated that in handling a personal injury case, he committed an act of moral turpitude by endorsing the name of one payee on a settlement check without notifying the payee and without its authorization.

In 2004, the Rawlings Co., which specializes in recovering medical expenses, sent Slijepcevich a claim for his client’s medical benefits. Rawlings had paid about $9,900 for her treatment and had filed a lien with the other party’s insurance company, RMIS. Slijepcevich notified both companies that his client did not have automobile insurance and he was seeking only to recover lost wages, not medical expenses.

Subsequently RMIS settled the matter for $15,000 but Slijepcevich did not notify Rawlings. The settlement check was issued to Slijepcevich, his client and Rawlings; Slijepcevich cashed it and deposited it in his client trust account without notifying Rawlings. He also sent his client’s signed release for all claims to RMIS without disclosing that Rawlings did not sign the release and in fact was not aware of it.

He distributed the settlement money to his client and himself.

When Rawlings learned about the check, it complained to the bar.

Slijepcevich also stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently.

In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation, offered to pay Rawlings some funds and he has family problems.