Cheryl Jane Erber was admitted to the California Bar 4th December 1990, but has since been disbarred. Cheryl graduated from Santa Clara University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Cheryl Jane Erber |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 4 December 1990 (34 years, 5 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 151382 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 415-321-8833 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | Santa Clara University SOL (Santa Clara CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | SUNY Coll at Cortland (Cortland NY) |
Address
| Current Address | 1900 Birch St Palo Alto, CA 94306 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 15 September 2012 | Disbarred (12 years, 7 months ago) Disbarment 10-O-01018 |
|---|---|
| 3 July 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 10 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 13 April 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years ago) Ordered inactive 10-O-01018 |
| 12 May 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 10-O-01018 |
| 28 February 2011 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 10-O-01018 (14 years, 2 months ago) |
| 8 January 2008 | Active (17 years, 3 months ago) |
| 1 January 1994 | Inactive (31 years, 4 months ago) |
| 4 December 1990 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (34 years, 5 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
September 15, 2012 CHERYL JANE ERBER, 54, of Palo Alto was disbarred Sept. 15, 2012, and was ordered to make restitution and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Erber’s default was entered in 2011 after she failed to respond to disciplinary charges of three acts of misconduct in two matters. Under rule 5.85 of the bar’s Rules of Procedure, she was disbarred for failing to act within 180 days to have the default set aside. She has no prior discipline record and no claims against her have been made to the Client Security Fund.The charges are considered proven. In one matter, she failed to perform legal services competently by not filing a complete temporary protective order or temporary restraining order on behalf of her client and she did not promptly refund any part of a $1,500 unearned fee. She also did not refund an unearned $2,000 fee in the second matter. |