B. Kwaku Duren was admitted to the California Bar 1st August 1990, but has since been disbarred. B. graduated from Peoples COL.

Lawyer Information

NameB. Kwaku Duren
First Admitted1 August 1990 (34 years, 9 months ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number147789

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number310-780-6739

School

Law SchoolPeoples COL (Los Angeles CA)

Address

Current AddressLaw Office of B. Kwaku Duren, 420 N Poinsettia Ave
Compton, CA 90221
Map

History

12 March 2017Disbarred (8 years, 1 month ago)
Disbarment 15-O-12259
14 October 2016Not eligible to practice law in CA (8 years, 6 months ago)
Ordered inactive 15-O-12259
1 July 2016Not eligible to practice law in CA (8 years, 10 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
18 April 2016Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years ago)
Ordered inactive 15-O-12259
25 February 2016Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 15-O-12259 (9 years, 2 months ago)
12 January 2016Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 3 months ago)
Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 16-Q-10142
17 November 2014Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 5 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 12-O-11841
10 June 2013Active (11 years, 10 months ago)
10 May 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 12 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 12-O-11841
1 August 1990Admitted to the State Bar of California (34 years, 9 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

May 10, 2013

B. KWAKU DUREN [#147789], 70, of Compton was suspended for two years, stayed, and placed on two years of probation with an actual 30-day suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE and to pay restitution. The order took effect May 10, 2013.

Duren stipulated that he failed to perform legal services with competence by not showing up at a hearing which led to his client’s foreclosure case being dismissed. Duren also did not inform the client of significant developments in her case, failed to promptly refund $10,000 in unearned fees and failed to give her a proper accounting when she asked for a refund. He later, belatedly, returned $2,000 of the fees.

In mitigation, Duren had more than 20 years of discipline-free practice prior to the misconduct, has been involved in numerous pro bono activities and cooperated with the State Bar by entering into a stipulation before trial.

As part of the stipulation, Duren was ordered to pay $8,000, plus interest, to the former client.