Richard Gerard Prantil was first admitted to the California Bar 14th August 1990, but is now no longer eligible to practice. Richard graduated from Western State University.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Richard Gerard Prantil |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 14 August 1990 (33 years, 8 months ago) |
| Status | Not Eligible to Practice |
| Bar Number | 147764 |
| Sections | Family Law |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 619-709-6165 |
Schools
| Law School | Western State University (CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of San Francisco (San Francisco CA) |
Address
| Current Address | Law Office of Richard G. Prantil, 4365 Ampudia St San Diego, CA 92103-1052 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 25 March 2022 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (2 years, 1 month ago) Ordered inactive |
|---|---|
| 15 December 2020 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 20-O-30862 (3 years, 4 months ago) |
| 22 January 2002 | Active (22 years, 3 months ago) |
| 22 September 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 7 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 99-O-13551 |
| 14 August 1990 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (33 years, 8 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
September 22, 2001 RICHARD GERARD PRANTIL [#147764], 43, of San Diego was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on three years of probation with an actual four-month suspension and was ordered to make restitution, take the MPRE and comply with rule 955. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect Sept. 22, 2001. Prantil substituted in to a divorce case after the dissolution was complete. At the time the judgment was entered, the wife’s claim for interest in the couple’s property was to be released.Almost four years later, Prantil demanded and received $10,000 from a title company for the release of the claim, without his client’s knowledge. He filed a false and misleading document with the court, committing an act of moral turpitude.In mitigation, he has no prior record of discipline, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation and he provided references attesting to his good character. |