Walter Percy Williams II was admitted to the California Bar 11th June 1990, but has since been disbarred. Walter graduated from University of Arizona COL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Walter Percy Williams II |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 11 June 1990 (33 years, 10 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 146569 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 951-273-0732 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | University of Arizona COL (Tucson AZ) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | California St University (Los Angeles CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 3638 University Ave #200 Riverside, CA 92501 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 3 May 2003 | Disbarred (21 years ago) Disbarment 02-N-12462 |
|---|---|
| 16 November 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 5 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-12462 |
| 24 August 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (21 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 02-N-12462 |
| 18 June 2002 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 02-N-12462 (21 years, 10 months ago) |
| 3 April 2002 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 1 month ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 98-O-03418 |
| 1 September 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 4 June 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (22 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 98-O-03418 |
| 29 March 2001 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 98-O-03418 (23 years, 1 month ago) |
| 22 October 1999 | Active (24 years, 6 months ago) |
| 27 September 1999 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 7 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 11 June 1990 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (33 years, 10 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
May 3, 2003 WALTER PERCY WILLIAMS II [#146569], 43, of Riverside was disbarred May 3, 2003, and ordered to comply with rule 955. Percy failed to comply with rule 955, as ordered in a 2002 discipline, by not filing the required affidavit with the Supreme Court stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other interested parties of his suspension.The discipline was the result of mishandling two matters by failing to promptly pay out client funds, account for funds, communicate with clients or cooperate with the bar’s investigation. |