Frank Angelo D'Alfonsi was admitted to the California Bar 12th June 1990, but has since been disbarred. Frank graduated from San Francisco Law School.

Lawyer Information

NameFrank Angelo D'Alfonsi
First Admitted12 June 1990 (35 years ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number146104

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number415-759-7410
Fax Number415-664-4280

Schools

Law SchoolSan Francisco Law School (San Francisco CA)
Undergraduate SchoolSan Francisco State Unv (San Francisco CA)

Address

Current AddressLaw Ofc Frank A D'Alfonsi, 333 W Portal Ave #B
San Francisco, CA 94127-1411
Map

History

8 September 2010Disbarred (14 years, 9 months ago)
Disbarment 09-O-12257
4 April 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 2 months ago)
Ordered inactive 09-O-12257
1 January 2010Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 5 months ago)
Ordered inactive 09-O-12257
5 November 2009Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 7 months ago)
Ordered inactive 09-O-12257
16 July 2009Not eligible to practice law in CA (15 years, 11 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 03-O-03682
28 July 2005Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 03-O-03682 (19 years, 10 months ago)
12 June 1990Admitted to the State Bar of California (35 years ago)

Discipline Summaries

September 8, 2010

FRANK ANGELO D’ALFONSI [#146104], 72, of San Francisco was disbarred Sept. 8, 2010, and was ordered to make restitution and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court.

In a default matter, the State Bar Court recommended that D’Alfonsi be disbarred for failing to comply with rule 9.20, as required by a 2009 disciplinary order, and for misconduct, including misappropriation, while representing a client in the purchase of a business.

The client gave D’Alfonsi a check for $35,000 as his down payment for the purchase of the business as well as a $1,500 advance attorney fee. He put the money in his general bank account rather than a client trust account and misappropriated the $35,000. At one point, D’Alfonsi wrote a check to his client for $35,000 but it bounced. He said bank error was to blame.

D’Alfonsi also did not prepare the purchase agreement, licensing papers or do any other work connected to purchasing his client’s business. The client bought the business without D’Alfonsi’s help.

D’Alfonsi stipulated that he commingled funds, failed to hold funds in trust, communicate with his client, perform legal services competently, refund unearned fees or cooperate with the bar’s investigation, and he committed acts of moral turpitude by misappropriating client funds and making misstatements to his client.

In the probation violation matter, he did not submit to the bar court an affidavit stating that he notified his clients, opposing counsel and other interested parties of his suspension from practice. Failure to comply with rule 9.20 is grounds for disbarment. D’Alfonsi also violated probation requirements by not contacting the bar’s probation office, submitting a quarterly report or complying with laboratory testing conditions.

He was disciplined previously and in that matter, the court considered as mitigation his cooperation with the bar’s investigation, no prior discipline, physical and emotional difficulties and participation in the Lawyers Assistance Program.

July 16, 2009

FRANK A. D’ALFONSI [#146104], 71, of San Francisco was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with a one-year actual suspension and was ordered to make restitution, take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20. If the actual suspension exceeds two years, he must prove his rehabilitation. The order took effect July 16, 2009.

After stipulating to misconduct in 2006, D’Alfonsi was accepted into the State Bar’s Alternative Discipline Program for lawyers with substance abuse or mental health issues and he also joined the Lawyer Assistance Program. He was terminated from the LAP in 2008 for failing to comply with one of its requirements, and subsequently was removed from the ADP for not meeting restitution requirements.

He admitted 10 counts of misconduct in three matters.

A client D’Alfonsi represented in a real property matter loaned him $10,000, but the terms were unsecured and he did not advise the client to seek independent legal advice. He failed to repay the note on time, never paid any interest and never did any legal work. He also did not refund the client’s advance fee of $8,000.

In a contingency matter, D’Alfonsi did not complete arbitration, as ordered by the court, appear at several hearings or respond to discovery. After the arbitrator’s award was entered, he sought a trial, but the opposing side won a judgment against his client.

When D’Alfonsi met with his client and her daughter, he told them the opposing party had offered to settle the case for $3,500 and the money would be paid in two weeks. He did not return his client’s phone calls and she learned the truth about her case via the Internet.

In the third matter, he was to file a civil complaint for a client in a dispute with a neighbor. He never did so, did not refund the client’s $1,500 fee and did not respond to 12 letters.

In mitigation, D’Alfonsi cooperated with the bar’s investigation, had no prior discipline and had several physical and emotional problems.