Kirsten Beth Anderson was admitted to the California Bar 6th June 1989, but has since been disbarred. Kirsten graduated from Lincoln University.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Kirsten Beth Anderson |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 6 June 1989 (34 years, 11 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 140011 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 408-279-4135 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | Lincoln University (CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | San Jose State University (San Jose CA) |
Address
| Current Address | P O Box 8567 San Jose, CA 95155-8567 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 20 May 1998 | Disbarred (25 years, 11 months ago) Disbarment 97-N-12611 |
|---|---|
| 29 November 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 5 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-N-12611 |
| 12 July 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 9 months ago) Ordered inactive 97-N-12611 |
| 12 May 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-N-12611 (26 years, 11 months ago) |
| 15 March 1997 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 1 month ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 96-H-03465 |
| 14 September 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (27 years, 7 months ago) Ordered inactive 96-H-03465 |
| 27 June 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-H-03465 (27 years, 10 months ago) |
| 25 May 1995 | Public reproval with/duties 93-O-20212 (28 years, 11 months ago) |
| 28 September 1994 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 93-O-20212 (29 years, 7 months ago) |
| 29 August 1994 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 8 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
| 1 January 1994 | Inactive (30 years, 4 months ago) |
| 6 June 1989 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (34 years, 11 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
May 20, 1998 KIRSTEN BETH ANDERSON [#140011], 43, of San Jose was disbarred May 20, 1998, and ordered to comply with rule 955 of the California Rules of Court. Anderson was disbarred following her failure to comply with rule 955, a requirement of a February 1997 suspension order. That order was the result of her failure to comply with requirements of a 1995 public reproval.The public reproval was based on misconduct in three separate client matters, as well as failure to cooperate with the State Bar and maintain an accurate address since 1993.“[Anderson] has not participated in these disciplinary proceedings, which raises a grave concern that she has no regard whatsoever for her professional obligation,†wrote the bar court judge.March 15, 1997 KIRSTEN ANDERSON [#140011], 42, of San Jose was suspended for 90 days and until she attends the State Bar ethics school, passes the MPRE and updates her membership address of record. Should the period of actual suspension exceed two years, she will remain suspended until she has shown proof of her fitness to practice law. She also was ordered to comply with rule 955. The order took effect March 15, 1997. Anderson failed to comply with conditions of a public reproval she received in 1995. No mitigating circumstances were established, but her prior record of discipline was considered an aggravating factor. In its decision and recommendation, the bar court's hearing department wrote that Anderson's failure to participate in the current discipline proceedings prior to default showed a lack of respect and that she has repeatedly ignored disciplinary obligations. |