Philadelphia, PA 19118
11 May 2001 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 97-O-17134 |
---|---|
30 May 2000 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 97-O-17134 (24 years, 12 months ago) |
18 May 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 94-O-16575 |
27 June 1995 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 94-O-16575 (29 years, 11 months ago) |
17 July 1994 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (30 years, 10 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 92-O-10350 |
23 October 1992 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 92-O-10350 (32 years, 7 months ago) |
7 December 1988 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (36 years, 5 months ago) |
May 11, 2001 JEFFREY BENNETT WOLIN [#137398], 43, of Tarzana was suspended for three years, stayed, and placed on probation for four years with an actual suspension of 30 months and until he has shown proof of rehabilitation and fitness to practice. He was ordered to take the MPRE during the actual suspension period and comply with rule 955. The order took effect May 11, 2001. Wolin stipulated he accepted employment with Bio-Rad Laboratories, working as assistant general counsel and a legal consultant from 1994 to 1997. All the while, he was suspended from the practice of law.In February 1995, Wolin participated in investigating a sexual harassment claim, signing a declaration under condition of perjury that he was in-house counsel for the company. He asserted that he had assisted in the investigation and concurred in a recommendation to fire an employee.By accepting the position and participating in legal matters, Wolin held himself out to his employer, the court, opposing counsel and the public as entitled to practice law when he was not, which constituted an act of moral turpitude.In mitigation, Wolin’s actions did not harm his client.In aggravation, the bar court found Wolin was dishonest in leading his employer to believe he was licensed to practice. Also, a multiple pattern of misconduct was evident: The reason he had been suspended in the first place was because he had offered his services as a lawyer while serving an actual suspension for a 1994 disciplinary action.In July 1994, he received an 18-month actual suspension for an act of moral turpitude. In 1996, he received a six-month actual suspension. He resigned from his law firm, advising the partners he had medical problems but not revealing the suspension. He then called a client of the firm and offered to handle a case. When the client learned from the bar of Wolin’s suspension, he notified the law firm.May 18, 1996 JEFFREY B. WOLIN [#137398], 38, of Tarzana was suspended for six months and until he proves rehabilitation and fitness to practice. The order took effect May 18, 1996, but the actual suspension began Jan. 17. Wolin was suspended in July 1994 and placed on probation for 18 months and until he made restitution. He resigned from his law firm, advising the partners he had medical problems but not revealing the suspension.He then called a client of the firm and offered to handle a case. When the client learned from the bar of Wolin's suspension, he notified the law firm.Wolin's conduct amounted to practicing law while suspended. He also did not cooperate with the bar's investigation. |