Franklin Feigenbaum was admitted to the California Bar 14th June 1988, but is now resigned. Franklin graduated from Whittier Coll SOL.

Lawyer Information

NameFranklin Feigenbaum
First Admitted14 June 1988 (35 years, 10 months ago)
StatusResigned
Bar Number134403

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number1717681619

Schools

Law SchoolWhittier Coll SOL (CA)
Undergraduate SchoolSee Registration Card

Location

Current AddressAlfred-Neumann-Anger 9
81737 Munich, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Map

History

17 August 2000Resigned (23 years, 8 months ago)
Resignation with charges pending 00-Q-02194
5 June 2000Not eligible to practice law in CA (23 years, 11 months ago)
Vol.inactive(tender of resign.w/charges) 00-Q-12194
19 December 1999Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 4 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 96-O-08704
27 September 1999Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 7 months ago)
Suspended, failed to pay fees
5 June 1999Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 11 months ago)
Ordered inactive 96-O-08704
12 March 1998Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-08704 (26 years, 1 month ago)
31 December 1996Inactive (27 years, 4 months ago)
14 June 1988Admitted to the State Bar of California (35 years, 10 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

December 19, 1999

FRANKLIN FEIGENBAUM [#134403], 37, of Northridge was suspended for six months, stayed, placed on one year of probation with a 90-day actual suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE within a year and comply with rule 955. The order took effect Dec. 19, 1999.

Feigenbaum was hired as an independent contract attorney to represent a corporate client. Although he filed the client’s answer to a complaint and filed a statement of claim in the arbitration phase of the case, he did no further work.

He did not communicate with the client or notify the client about a hearing, missed a conference call dealing with the arbitration, and did not respond to requests for a status report.

When the State Bar tried to investigate, an inquiry letter was returned as undeliverable.

Feigenbaum then changed his address and went inactive at the same time, but he did not cooperate with the investigation.

In a default proceeding, the bar court found that he withdrew from employment without protecting his client’s interests and failed to keep his client informed about developments in its case.