Kansas City, MO 64102-1079
29 May 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 11 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 10-J-00535 |
---|---|
27 January 2012 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 3 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 11-PM-15183 |
2 October 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 7 months ago) Ordered inactive 11-PM-15183 |
31 March 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 1 month ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 10-J-00535 |
6 May 2010 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 10-J-00535 (15 years ago) |
12 August 1996 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (28 years, 9 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
1 April 1990 | Inactive (35 years, 1 month ago) |
11 December 1987 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (37 years, 5 months ago) |
January 27, 2012 The probation of SUSAN L. DILL [#132607], 55, of Kansas City, Mo., was revoked and she was suspended for two years and until she proves her rehabilitation. She was ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and receives credit for a period of involuntary inactive enrollment that began Oct. 2, 2011. The order took effect Jan. 27, 2012. Dill stipulated to misconduct in 2010 but did not contact the State Bar Office of Probation within 30 days or submit one quarterly probation report. The misconduct occurred in Missouri and included failures to keep client funds separate from her own, promptly disburse client funds or give the client a written settlement statement.March 31, 2011 SUSAN L. DILL [#132607], 54, of Kansas City, Mo., was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 30-day actual suspension and she was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect March 31, 2011. Dill was publicly reprimanded by the Missouri Supreme Court for three acts of misconduct that, had they been committed in California, would warrant discipline in this state. She failed to keep client funds separate from her own, promptly disburse client funds or give the client a written settlement statement.Although she settled a matter in Missouri, where she has worked since 1990, she didn’t promptly disburse client funds. The client was owed $10,000. Dill gave her $2,500 about six weeks after settlement and sent the rest a month later. However, she was required to send the money within 60 days. She also didn’t give the client an accounting.Dill practiced in California for about two years before moving to Missouri and going inactive. In mitigation, she cooperated with the investigation, demonstrated remorse, completed almost 13 hours of continuing education and presented evidence of her good character. |