San Mateo, CA 94402-1529
1 July 2022 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (2 years, 10 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
---|---|
15 January 2020 | Active (5 years, 3 months ago) |
2 July 2019 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (5 years, 10 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
4 May 2010 | Active (15 years ago) |
8 December 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 5 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 99-PM-10945 |
21 August 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (24 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 99-PM-10945 |
22 March 2000 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (25 years, 1 month ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 98-H-00391 |
27 September 1998 | Discipline, probation; no actual susp. 98-H-00391 (26 years, 7 months ago) |
30 March 1997 | Private reproval, public disclosure 95-O-15274 (28 years, 1 month ago) |
30 July 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-15274 (28 years, 9 months ago) |
31 July 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 9 months ago) Admin Inactive/MCLE noncompliance |
31 July 1995 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (29 years, 9 months ago) Suspended, failed to pay fees |
11 December 1987 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (37 years, 5 months ago) |
December 8, 2000 The probation of WILLIAM M. AMBRUNN [#132051], 38, of San Francisco was revoked, the previously ordered stay of suspension was lifted, and he was suspended for one year and ordered to comply with rule 955. Credit toward the actual suspension will be given for a period of involuntary inactive enrollment which began Aug. 21, 2000. The order took effect Dec. 8, 2000. Ambrunn was suspended and placed on probation in 1998 but failed to comply with the conditions of his probation: he did not file quarterly probation reports or attend ethics school or trust account school.He has a prior record of discipline, including a 1997 private reproval for failing to perform legal services competently, communicate with a client, promptly return a client file or cooperate with the bar’s investigation.When he did not comply with the conditions attached to the reproval, he was disciplined in 1998.Ambrunn did not participate in the probation revocation proceeding. |