Bend, OR 97702
17 June 2016 | Disbarred (8 years, 11 months ago) Disbarment 14-N-05646 |
---|---|
3 December 2015 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 5 months ago) Ordered inactive 14-N-05646 |
24 May 2015 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 14-N-05646 |
24 February 2015 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 14-N-05646 (10 years, 2 months ago) |
8 August 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 9 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 13-O-12536 |
7 November 2013 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 13-O-12536 (11 years, 6 months ago) |
16 October 2006 | Active (18 years, 7 months ago) |
1 January 1996 | Inactive (29 years, 4 months ago) |
14 December 1987 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (37 years, 5 months ago) |
June 17, 2016 DIRK DWIGHT SHARP [#130772], 58, of Bend, Ore., was disbarred June 17, 2016 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Sharp did not respond to a notice of disciplinary charges, leading to his default being entered. He did not seek to have his default set aside within 90 days so the bar moved to disbar him.The charges were deemed admitted. Sharp failed to comply with rule 9.20 following an earlier discipline.Sharp’s one prior discipline was a July 2014 suspension for four counts of misconduct in a single client matter, including committing acts of moral turpitude by knowingly making false representations to his client and failing to perform legal services with competence, respond to reasonable client status inquiries or account.August 8, 2014 DIRK DWIGHT SHARP [#130772], 56, of Bend, Oregon, was suspended from the practice of law for six months and ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. He was also placed on two years’ probation and faces a one-year suspension if he does not comply with the terms of his probation. The order took effect Aug. 8, 2014. Sharp stipulated to misconduct in one client matter. In 2006, he agreed to represent a man who was in prison for attempted murder and help him explore his appellate options. At the client’s direction, the client’s mother paid Sharp $25,000 in two installments.Sharp visited the client a couple times and provided him with a few documents, including an application for writ of habeas corpus, but nothing was ever filed in court. Sharp never performed any services of value on the client’s behalf.Between September 2006 and July 2013, the client’s family members called Sharp repeatedly asking for updates on his appeal but Sharp did not respond until after a State Bar complaint was filed.He was fired on July 10, 2013, but did not provide the client with an accounting.In mitigation, he entered into a pretrial stipulation with the State Bar and had no prior record of discipline. |