Reginald Von Terrell was admitted to the California Bar 17th June 1987, but has since been disbarred. Reginald graduated from UC Davis SOL King Hall.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Reginald Von Terrell |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 17 June 1987 (38 years ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 127874 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 510-237-9700 |
|---|---|
| Fax Number | 510-237-4616 |
Schools
| Law School | UC Davis SOL King Hall (Davis CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | St Mary's Coll (Moraga CA) |
Address
| Current Address | The Terrell Law Group, PO Box 13315 Oakland, CA 94661 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 28 May 2016 | Disbarred (9 years ago) Disbarment 14-O-04098 |
|---|---|
| 23 October 2015 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 8 months ago) Ordered inactive 14-O-04098 |
| 28 June 2015 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 11 months ago) Ordered inactive 14-O-04098 |
| 18 February 2015 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 14-O-04098 (10 years, 4 months ago) |
| 16 March 1997 | Public reproval with/duties 96-H-01785 (28 years, 3 months ago) |
| 10 September 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-H-01785 (28 years, 9 months ago) |
| 26 March 1995 | Public reproval with/duties 92-O-16424 (30 years, 3 months ago) |
| 17 June 1987 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (38 years ago) |
Discipline Summaries
May 28, 2016 REGINALD VON TERRELL [#127874], 57, of Oakland, was disbarred May 28, 2016 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Von Terrell was disbarred after his default was entered for failing to appear at his disciplinary trial. Because he did not seek to have the default set aside or vacated within 45 days as required under rule 5.85 of the State Bar’s Rules of Procedure, he was disbarred and the charges against him deemed admitted.Von Terrell failed to maintain client funds in trust, engaged in moral turpitude/misappropriation, made misrepresentations to a client and failed to cooperate with a State Bar investigation. He was ordered to pay $89,314.09 plus interest in restitution.He had been disciplined on two prior occasions. In 1995, he received a public reproval for failing to deposit client funds in trust and failing to promptly pay out client funds. In 1997, he was publicly reproved again for not complying with the terms surrounding his earlier discipline. |