Burbank, CA 91502-1727
21 February 1999 | Active (26 years, 2 months ago) |
---|---|
24 December 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 4 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-18320 |
21 August 1998 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (26 years, 8 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 95-O-13943 |
30 September 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-18320 (27 years, 7 months ago) |
25 June 1997 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-O-07458 (27 years, 10 months ago) |
17 July 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-15779 (28 years, 9 months ago) |
18 April 1996 | Active (29 years ago) |
11 March 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 95-O-13943 (29 years, 1 month ago) |
11 December 1986 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (38 years, 5 months ago) |
August 21, 1998 JOHN H. GREENWOOD [#125707], 42, of Beverly Hills was suspended for 18 months, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 90-day actual suspension, and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year and to comply with rule 955. The order took effect Aug. 21, 1998. The review department of the State Bar Court agreed with bar prosecutors that Greenwood should receive an actual suspension for misconduct the bar court found in 1997.In a default trial, hearing Judge Nancy Roberts Lonsdale found that Greenwood failed to perform legal services competently in two matters. In the first, he represented a client of a Michigan law firm who was injured while visiting California. The case was dismissed when Greenwood failed to appear at a mandatory status conference. He never informed the client or the Michigan counsel of the dismissal, and did not respond to a State Bar investigation.The court also found that he failed to properly withdraw from representation.In the second matter, Greenwood failed to respond to discovery requests in a civil case despite several time extensions. The court dismissed the case, and Greenwood sought relief from the dismissal four months after the five-year statute of limitations expired.However, he did not respond to several requests from the client that he return her file, nor did he reply to a bar investigator's inquiry.Lonsdale first recommended that Greenwood be given an 18-month stayed suspension with probation conditions, including a 90-day actual suspension.However, she later issued a new order, setting aside the default and eliminating the actual suspension, after Greenwood pleaded that he had been despondent over his mother's death, became unable to work, and vacated his office for a time.The bar sought review, arguing that Lonsdale erred in setting aside the default and in not recommending an actual suspension. The review court agreed. |