Frederick Carlos Kumpel is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 11th December 1985. Frederick graduated from Georgetown University Law Ctr.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Frederick Carlos Kumpel |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 11 December 1985 (38 years, 4 months ago) |
| Status | Active |
| Bar Number | 122073 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 661-599-9078 |
Schools
| Law School | Georgetown University Law Ctr (Washington DC) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | California St University Bakersfield (CA) |
Address
| Current Address | 6116 Castleton St Bakersfield, CA 93313-3577 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 2 March 2010 | Active (14 years, 2 months ago) |
|---|---|
| 1 January 2010 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (14 years, 4 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 09-PM-12955 |
| 13 July 2007 | Active (16 years, 9 months ago) |
| 13 June 2007 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (16 years, 10 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 04-O-15857 |
| 10 July 2006 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 04-O-15857 (17 years, 9 months ago) |
| 11 December 1985 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (38 years, 4 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
January 1, 2010 The probation of FREDERICK CARLOS KUMPEL [#122073], 51, of Bakersfield was revoked, the previous stay of suspension was lifted and he was suspended for 60 days and placed on probation for one year. The order took effect Jan. 1, 2010. Kumpel did not comply with probation conditions attached to a 2007 discipline. He failed to contact the probation office by a deadline, file six probation reports on time or attend ethics school. The underlying discipline was imposed as a result of his failure toperform legal services competently and for misrepresenting the status of a case to his client.In mitigation, he has been active in local bar activities and has done extensive pro bono and community work.June 13, 2007 FREDERICK CARLOS KUMPEL [#122073], 48, of Bakersfield was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 30-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect June 13, 2007. Kumpel stipulated to three counts of misconduct in two cases.In the first, he represented the defendants in a civil case and agreed to file a cross complaint. After he failed to appear at a case management conference or file any pleadings, the court entered a judgment against Kumpel’s clients of $63,295.53.Kumpel stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently.In the second matter, he represented a client on a contingency basis in a personal injury claim. He filed a complaint but did not appear at a case management conference and failed to file a case management conference statement or a proof of service. As a result, the court set an order to show cause hearing.Two days before the hearing, Kumpel filed a request for dismissal of the case without his clients’ knowledge. For several months, he continued to tell the clients that he was working on their case although it had been dismissed.He stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently and committed an act of moral turpitude by misrepresenting the status of the matter to his clients.In mitigation, Kumpel has no prior discipline record.June 13, 2007 FREDERICK CARLOS KUMPEL [#122073], 48, of Bakersfield was suspended for one year, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a 30-day actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year. The order took effect June 13, 2007. Kumpel stipulated to three counts of misconduct in two cases.In the first, he represented the defendants in a civil case and agreed to file a cross complaint. After he failed to appear at a case management conference or file any pleadings, the court entered a judgment against Kumpel’s clients of $63,295.53.Kumpel stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently.In the second matter, he represented a client on a contingency basis in a personal injury claim. He filed a complaint but did not appear at a case management conference and failed to file a case management conference statement or a proof of service. As a result, the court set an order to show cause hearing.Two days before the hearing, Kumpel filed a request for dismissal of the case without his clients’ knowledge. For several months, he continued to tell the clients that he was working on their case although it had been dismissed.He stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently and committed an act of moral turpitude by misrepresenting the status of the matter to his clients.In mitigation, Kumpel has no prior discipline record. |