Paul Randall Bartleson was admitted to the California Bar 10th December 1985, but has since been disbarred. Paul graduated from McGeorge SOL University of the Pacific.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Paul Randall Bartleson |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 10 December 1985 (39 years, 6 months ago) |
| Status | Disbarred |
| Bar Number | 119273 |
Contact
| Phone Number | 530-488-9311 |
|---|
Schools
| Law School | McGeorge SOL University of the Pacific (CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of California Santa Barbara (CA) |
Address
| Current Address | Law Ofc Paul R Bartleson, 1542 Sweet Juliet Ln Lincoln, CA 95648 |
|---|---|
| Map |
History
| 23 October 2015 | Disbarred (9 years, 7 months ago) Disbarment 12-O-10051 |
|---|---|
| 8 May 2015 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 1 month ago) Ordered inactive 12-O-10051 |
| 15 March 2014 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 3 months ago) Ordered inactive 12-O-10051 |
| 4 February 2013 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (12 years, 4 months ago) Suspended, failed to pass Prof.Resp.Exam 10-O-02377 |
| 8 February 2012 | Active (13 years, 4 months ago) |
| 9 December 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 10-O-02377 |
| 10 December 1985 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (39 years, 6 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
October 23, 2015 PAUL RANDALL BARTLESON [#119273], 57, of Lincoln, was disbarred Oct. 23, 2015 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. Bartleson was disbarred after his default was entered for failing to respond to a notice of disciplinary charges. Because he did not seek to have the default set aside or vacated within 180 days, as required under rule 5.85 of the State Bar’s Rules of Procedure, he was disbarred and the charges deemed admitted.He improperly withdrew from representation, split fees with non-lawyers, did not respond promptly to client inquiries or inform them of significant developments, violated probation conditions, did not perform competently, failed to inform his client of conflicts and did not return unearned fees. The misconduct involved four client matters.He had one prior record of discipline, a 2011 suspension for charging unconscionable fees and failing to obey a court order. |