Richard Steven Scott was admitted to the California Bar 13th June 1984, but has since been disbarred. Richard graduated from Western State University.

Lawyer Information

NameRichard Steven Scott
First Admitted13 June 1984 (41 years ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number113601

Contact

Phone Number951-360-3914

Schools

Law SchoolWestern State University (CA)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of Houston (Houston TX)

Address

Current Address6573 Baker St
Riverside, CA 92509
Map

History

30 April 1997Disbarred (28 years, 1 month ago)
Disbarment 93-O-17436
6 November 1995Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 93-O-17436 (29 years, 7 months ago)
13 June 1984Admitted to the State Bar of California (41 years ago)

Discipline Summaries

April 30, 1997

RICHARD STEVEN SCOTT [#113601], 53, of Riverside was disbarred April 30, 1997, and ordered to comply with rule 955.

Scott's disbarment followed a default hearing involving multiple acts of wrongdoing in six separate client matters. In addition, he failed to cooperate with the bar's investigation of four of those matters.

In this decision, the bar court hearing judge found that Scott's misconduct was followed by bad faith, dishonesty and concealment. In one matter, he attempted to conceal the superior court's dismissal of a client's case for lack of prosecution by sending the client a new contingency fee agreement and misrepresenting to her that the action was still pending.

In another matter, Scott misrepresented to a client that the superior court had not given a reason for dismissal of his case, when in fact, it was the result of his failure to appear at two hearings.

As a result of his misconduct, at least three of Scott's clients lost their causes of action and another client had a significant delay in finalizing a settlement.

In another case, he delayed returning a client's files and about $72,000 in entrusted funds for seven months. Scott also closed his office without informing one client and stopped communicating with other clients.

The hearing judge said he was particularly troubled by the length of time in which the misconduct occurred (about two years) and by Scott's lack of participation in the disciplinary proceedings.