Scott Nelson Harlow was admitted to the California Bar 7th December 1982, but has since been disbarred. Scott graduated from University of Windsor.

Lawyer Information

NameScott Nelson Harlow
First Admitted7 December 1982 (41 years, 4 months ago)
StatusDisbarred
Bar Number107024

Contact

Current Email[email protected]
Phone Number760-537-0020
Fax Number760-325-1148

Schools

Law SchoolUniversity of Windsor (Canada)
Undergraduate SchoolUniversity of Toronto (Canada)

Address

Current Address611 S Palm Canyon Dr Ste 7079
Palm Springs, CA 92264
Map

History

30 October 2014Disbarred (9 years, 5 months ago)
Disbarment 12-O-12820
16 May 2014Not eligible to practice law in CA (9 years, 11 months ago)
Ordered inactive 12-O-12820
5 July 2013Not eligible to practice law in CA (10 years, 9 months ago)
Ordered inactive 12-O-12820
15 April 2013Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 12-O-12820 (11 years ago)
26 August 2012Not eligible to practice law in CA (11 years, 8 months ago)
Discipline w/actual suspension 11-O-11247
27 December 2011Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 11-O-11247 (12 years, 4 months ago)
7 December 1982Admitted to the State Bar of California (41 years, 4 months ago)

Discipline Summaries

October 30, 2014

SCOTT NELSON HARLOW [#107024], 58, of Palm Springs, was disbarred Oct. 30, 2014 and ordered to comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court and make restitution. Harlow was disbarred after his default was entered for failing to respond to charges of misconduct in five matters. Because he did not seek to have the default set aside within 180 days as required under rule 5.85 of the State Bar’s Rules of Procedure, he was disbarred and the charges against him were deemed admitted. Among other misconduct, Harlow made misrepresentations to clients and failed to perform legal services with competence, inform clients of significant developments, refund unearned fees or cooperate in a State Bar investigation. In one matter, he forged the signature of an appointed referee, assisted a decedent’s cousin in improperly withdrawing all of an estate’s assets, misappropriated client funds, misrepresented to his client that he had filed a petition, failed to refund unearned fees and did not respond to two letters from a State Bar investigator inquiring about the allegations made against him. He also did not comply with rule 9.20 as required following his 2012 suspension. In that matter, Harlow made false statements to his clients and failed to perform legal services with competence, release a client’s file or return unearned fees. Harlow has been ordered to pay $7,655 plus interest in restitution.

August 26, 2012

SCOTT NELSON HARLOW, 55, of Palm Springs was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on three years of probation with an actual one-year suspension and he was ordered to take the MPRE and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Aug. 26, 2012.

Harlow stipulated to seven counts of misconduct in two matters.

He provided no legal services to a client who hired him for a civil matter in which he claimed damages of $90,000 as a result of not being able to sell his business. Harlow falsely told the client he had filed a lawsuit that was delayed due to a lack of judges, recommended the client pursue arbitration, prepared a declaration his client signed, believing Harlow was working on the matter, and eventually told the client he had obtained an $85,000 judgment against the opposing party. He made even more misstatements, raising the amount of the judgment to $110,000 and claiming he had appeared in court and attempted to have the other party arrested.

Harlow stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently, refund an unearned fee or return a client file, and he committed acts of moral turpitude.

He also provided no legal services in a case for which he was to obtain unpaid commissions totaling more than $24,000. Again he made a series of misrepresentations — that a lawsuit was filed and that the matter went to arbitration, where the client won an award. Harlow prepared a purported arbitrator’s award forging the arbitrator’s signature.

He stipulated that he failed to perform legal services competently or refund an unearned fee and he committed acts of moral turpitude.

In mitigation, Harlow had no prior discipline record.