Kevin John Mirch is an active member of the California Bar and was admitted 6th December 1982. Kevin graduated from Santa Clara University SOL.
Lawyer Information
| Name | Kevin John Mirch |
|---|---|
| First Admitted | 6 December 1982 (42 years, 5 months ago) |
| Status | Active |
| Bar Number | 106973 |
Contact
| Current Email | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Phone Number | 619-501-6220 |
| Fax Number | 619-501-6890 |
Schools
| Law School | Santa Clara University SOL (Santa Clara CA) |
|---|---|
| Undergraduate School | University of Nevada (NV) |
Address
| Current Address | Mirch Law Firm LLP, 8895 Town Centre Drive, #105-551 San Diego, CA 92122 |
|---|---|
| Map | |
| Previous Address | Mirch Law Firm LLP 750 B St Ste 2500 San Diego, CA 92101 |
| Previous Address | Mirch Law Firm LLP, 1180 Rosecrans St # 104-552 San Diego, CA 92106-2660 |
History
| 9 April 2012 | Active (13 years ago) |
|---|---|
| 9 October 2011 | Not eligible to practice law in CA (13 years, 6 months ago) Discipline w/actual suspension 08-J-11461 |
| 6 August 2009 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 08-J-11461 (15 years, 9 months ago) |
| 22 July 1998 | Private reproval, public disclosure 96-J-05803 (26 years, 9 months ago) |
| 11 December 1996 | Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 96-J-05803 (28 years, 4 months ago) |
| 6 December 1982 | Admitted to the State Bar of California (42 years, 5 months ago) |
Discipline Summaries
October 9, 2011 KEVIN JOHN MIRCH, 54, of San Diego was suspended for two years, stayed, placed on two years of probation with a six-month actual suspension and was ordered to take the MPRE within one year and comply with rule 9.20 of the California Rules of Court. The order took effect Oct. 9, 2011. Mirch stipulated that discipline imposed on him in Nevada warranted discipline in California for maintaining an unjust action, accepting employment for the purpose of harassing or injuring someone and for misleading the court.Mirch filed a lawsuit in 2004 that made a series of false allegations against the defendants, including a scheme to commit bankruptcy fraud and charges that another attorney threatened reprisals against him, instructed his clients not to pay his fees and destroyed documents proving that he was entitled to receive a fee in excess of $1 million. He admitted in the stipulation that he intended to “harass, embarrass and otherwise injure and inconvenience†the defendants and that he “refused to accept responsibility for anything that was done in connection with the underlying litigation.â€The stipulation also indicates that he “pursued frivolous and unfounded theories of recovery†in the lawsuit.Mirch was privately reproved in 1988. In mitigation, he cooperated with the bar’s investigation. |